BETTER TREATMENT FOR STROKE VICTIMS
by Erik Everhart, Ph.D., Janet L. Shucard, Ph.D.,
Teresa Quatrin, M.D. and David W. Shucard, Ph.D.
To recognize faces facial expressions, young boys use more of their right brains, while young girls use more of their left brains. This suggests that the
brains of boys and girls are organized differently. It may also suggest that men and women who suffer brain injuries will benefit from
different treatment regimes.
At the State University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences, D. Erik Everhart, Ph.D., Janet L. Shucard, Ph.D.,
Teresa Quatrin, M.D. and David W. Shucard, Ph.D. studied 17 boys and 18
girls between the ages of 8 and 11 years. Given previous evidence for the
brain's right-hemisphere superiority in face processing, as well as adult
male superiority at spatial and non-verbal skills, the research team studied
pre-pubescent children to see whether boys' and girls' brains are already
differentiated in these areas before puberty.
In the study, the children performed two different types of tasks. For the
face-recognition-memory task, they viewed a series of three-slide sets. In
each set, the first slide had a face with an "X" in the middle to fixate
their gaze; it served as a baseline. The second slide gave them a "target"
face to study. The third "recognition" slide offered three faces, from
which they had to choose the target face regardless of expression.
Researchers used an electroencephalo-graphic (EEG) measure, called the
Event-Related Brain Potential, to study how the children's brain waves
changed in the left and right hemispheres as they performed this task.
In the second task, facial affect (emotional expression) identification, the
children viewed 24 pairs of slides. For the first slide of each pair, they
had to pick which face of four along the bottom displayed an emotion
matching that of a single face at the slide's top. In the second slide,
four faces were the same as the top face of slide one, but with different
feelings. The children had to pick the face whose feelings matched the
feeling shown in the first slide. There was no EEG measurement; instead
researchers tallied the children's accuracy and response times.
Supporting the researchers' hypothesis, prepubertal boys showed
significantly greater right- versus left-hemisphere activity during the
presentation of face stimuli, whereas girls displayed significantly greater
left- versus right-hemisphere involvement. What's more, boys'
right-hemisphere activity correlated significantly with their accuracy in
identifying facial affect -- a relationship not demonstrated for girls. Boys
and girls performed equally well on all tasks, but, the authors say, "they
may use differing, though overlapping, neuronal systems to complete the
task."
"It is possible," the authors speculate, "that boys process faces at a
global level (right hemisphere), whereas girls process faces at a more local
level (left hemisphere)." If so, they add, "the girls' approach could be
more of an advantage in detecting the fine changes in affective expression,
and thus they would be better at reading people." The findings, says Erik
Everhart, do not reflect an "either-or" phenomenon, but rather a tendency to
use different neuronal systems successfully, with many individual
differences.
Finally, the authors explore the study's important implications for how
injury to different parts of the brain, for example from strokes, might
differently affect the sexes. "The deficits in face processing and emotion
perception that occur following injury to this [face-processing] region,"
they write, "impact the patient socially and have wide-ranging effects on
their relationships, employment and more." Understanding the differential
damage caused by a brain lesion can, they explain, help determine the course
of treatment.
07/12/01
Reference: "Sex-Related Differences in Event-Related Potentials, Face
Recognition, and Facial Affect Processing in Prepubertal Children," D. Erik
Everhart, Ph.D., Janet L. Shucard, Ph.D., Teresa Quatrin, M.D., and David W.
Shucard, Ph.D.; Neuropsychology, Vol. 15. No. 3.
Back
|